The Manhattan Rare Book Company

1050 Second Ave, Gallery 50E
New York, NY 10022

tel: 212.326.8907  fax: 212.355.4403
   email: info@manhattanrarebooks.com

Science/Technology/Medicine

Literature/Modern Firsts

Americana/History/Travel

Art/Illustrated/Children's

home | new acquisitions | receive a catalog

 

First editions of the Townsend Acts of 1767

“The Townsend Duties Crisis was never resolved.  It culminated in the Boston Tea Party, that triggered off the final sequence of events leading to the War of American Independence.”

—Peter D.G. Thomas, The Townsend Duties Crisis

 

In 1767 the newly appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer, Charles Townsend, sought to remedy England’s mounting financial woes by introducing what are referred to as the Townsend Acts, comprising the Revenue Act, the Suspension of the New York Assembly Act, and the Board of Customs Act.  Townsend believed these Acts would raise revenues from the colonies without re-igniting the rebelliousness and widespread unrest that had followed the Stamp Act.  In his mind, the colonists chief objection to the Stamp Act was that it had been an ‘internal’ tax—i.e., a tax on goods manufactured within the colonies.  Townsend’s Revenue Act, therefore, taxed goods produced outside the colonies such as paint, tea, coffee and cocoa.  The plan was an utter failure: “As the new colonial duties came hard on the heels of a reduction of the land tax in England, the constitutional controversy over taxation was re-opened in an acute form.  Americans could point out that as taxes were reduced on English taxpayers, they were increased on the colonists”  (Dickerson, The Navigation Acts and the American Revolution). In addition, the duties were to be paid in British pounds, which only exacerbated the already severe strain on the colonial economy caused by the Currency Act of 1764.  However, the political purpose of the Revenue Act was even more significant than its adverse economic effects: “The proceeds of the Act were to be set aside to pay the salaries of governors, judges, and other royal officials, and thus to render them independent of colonial legislatures.  The purpose was clear, and every colonial leader recognized it”  (English Historical Documents, pp. 700).  This raised a serious constitutional issue, as the colonial legislatures no longer had control over the salaries of colonial officials.

 

The Act Suspending the New York Assembly (above) was designed to alleviate the burden of maintaining Royal troops in the colonies by suspending the New York Assembly until New York complied fully with the Quartering Act of 1765.  The colonists did not take well to the idea of Parliament suspending their right to exercise self-government.  Thomas Jefferson’s singularly articulate outrage tells of how the colonists viewed this Act: “One free and independent legislature hereby takes upon itself to suspend the powers of another, free and independent as itself...The common feelings of human nature must be surrendered up before his majesty’s subjects here can be persuaded to believe that they hold their political existence at the will of a British Parliament.”   The American Board of Customs Act of 1767 established a Board of Customs Commission in Boston to enforce the duties imposed by the Revenue Act.  The customs officers operated largely outside of the colonial legal system, and the abuses were widespread and greatly damaged relations between American seamen and the Royal officers:  “The new Board of Customs Commission devoted its energies to waging war upon ships, seamen, merchants, and commerce in the interest of revenue; multiplying oficers and employees for this purpose; inaugurating a new and rapacious coast guard service manned by unprincipled individuals interested chiefly in personal plunder.  This new coast guard service behaved like pirates and was soon at open war with the formerly loyal American seamen” (Dickerson, The Navigation Acts and the American Revolution). The effect of the Board of Customs Act was particularly dramatic in Boston where “popular opposition was immediate and increasingly violent, and more and more merchants in Boston moved or were driven in the direction of open defiance of enforcement” (English Historical Documents, pp. 710).  The escalating violence prompted Commodore Samuel Hood of the British Navy to send the warship Romney to Boston harbor, a harbinger of violence to come.

            The colonists responded to the Townsend Acts by organizing a series of non-importation agreements that would force English merchants to share in the economic pain.   The Repeal of the Townsend Acts came in 1770: all the Townsend duties were dropped except for the tea tax, but the damage was done: “A century of wisely administered trade and navigation laws had developed the greatest and most loyal colonial Empire in the world.  Abandonment of that policy destroyed the Empire in less than ten years”  (Dickerson, The Navigation Acts and the American Revolution).

Back to the Acts of Parliament, 1763-83

 

 

Science/Technology/Medicine

Literature/Modern Firsts

Americana/History/Travel

Art/Illustrated/Children's