|

(click
to view larger image) |
"Deeply
impressed the the difficulties and responsibilities of the position, and
humbly invoking the guidance of the Almighty God, I rely for success
upon the courage and firmness of the people, confident that their united
efforts under the blessing of Heaven will secure peace and
independence."
–R.
E. Lee upon being appointed General-In-Chief
"Providence
raises up the man for the time, and a man for this occasion, we believe,
has been raised up in Robert E. Lee, the Washington of the second
American Revolution."
-The
Richmond Dispatch, February 7, 1865
"Public
demand led to [Lee’s] reluctant acceptance of an appointment as
general-in-chief. The
Confederate Congress and Virginia Legislature adopted resolutions asking
for Lee’s appointment, but Lee told the president that he did not want
the job. Davis was hard
pressed to sustain his administration, though, and wanted to share
responsibility. On February
9, Lee accepted a rank similar to that bestowed upon Washington."
-McCaslin
|
|
[Robert E. Lee]. An Act to provide the
appointment of a General in Chief of the Armies of the Confederate
States. General Orders No. 3; Richmond, February 6, 1865. Housed in
custom half-leather box. $8000.
Official broadside Confederate
printing with seal on top left corner appointing Robert E. Lee
"General in Chief" of the Confederate forces:
| "The
Congress of the Confederate States of America do enact, That
there shall be appointed by the President, by and with the
advice and consent of the Senate, an office, who shall be
known and designated as 'General in Chief,' who shall be
ranking officer of the army, and as such, shall have command
of the military forces of the Confederate States... General
Robert E. Lee having been duly appointed General in Chief of
the Armies of the Confederate States, will assume the duties
thereof and will be obeyed and respected accordingly." |
By 1865 Jefferson Davis had lost
widespread support throughout the South. As the Confederacy’s fortunes
worsened, there was a growing sense that Davis lacked the political and,
in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief, the military skills needed to
deliver victory and independence from the Union.
Davis’s increasingly restive detractors began looking for ways
to diminish the president’s role and expand that of their great
general, Robert E. Lee, who enjoyed nearly god-like stature throughout
the South. Early proposals
for expanding Lee’s authority included the idea of simply making him
Commander-in-Chief and thus de facto leader of the Confederacy.
This never came to pass, in large part because Lee himself made
it clear that he had no wish to encroach upon Davis’s authority.
Despite this there was a widespread desire among the public, as
reflected in this Act of the Confederate Congress, for Lee’s role to
be expanded and Davis’s diminished.
This Act gave formal expression to this important shift in the
Confederate South.
Interestingly,
it was Lee’s great adversary, Ulysses S. Grant, who understood far
better than Lee himself that, for all practical purposes, Lee already
was the de facto leader of the South.
This is why Grant was so disappointed when, after Appomattox, Lee
refused to use his influence to encourage his subordinates to do as he
had done and surrender. As
he wrote in his Memoirs, Grant “suggested to General Lee that
there was not a man in the Confederacy whose influence with the soldiery
and the whole people was as great as his, and that if we would now
advise the surrender of all the armies [he] had no doubt [Lee’s]
advice would be followed with alacrity.”
Indeed, on April 10, 1865, just days after Lee’s surrender,
Grant went so far as to suggest that Lee bypass Davis’s authority
altogether and speak directly with Lincoln to negotiate terms of
surrender for the whole Confederacy
(McCaslin, 190). Lee
refused. In Lee’s view
only Davis, as president of the Confederacy, could negotiate with
Lincoln toward a general surrender.
Just as Lee underestimated – or refused to acknowledge – his
great influence among Southerners, so too did President Davis.
As McCaslin explains, “Davis
and many others initially refused to accept that Lee’s surrender
brought the end of the Confederacy…. British journalists agreed that
the war did not end with Lee. Instead, they expected guerilla warfare.
Lee’s refusal to participate made such a shift difficult, if not
impossible” (pp. 191). Despite
both Lee’s and Davis’ insistence on Davis’s preeminence, as Grant
observed, as a practical matter “The Confederacy had gone a long way
beyond the reach of President Davis, and that there was nothing that
could be done except what Lee could do to benefit the Southern
people.” This Act of
February 6, 1865 reflects the Confederate Congress’s understanding of
this fact.
A highly important piece of
Confederate legislation, these orders not only represent the culmination
of Robert E. Lee's career, but had significant effects on the outcome of
the war. After Lee was appointed "General in Chief" he became,
like Washington for the North, the central figure in which the
Confederates placed their hopes. Consequently, when Lee surrendered to
Grant, the implications were profound. "Without
their Washington, Southerner’s realized their revolution was
over" (McCaslin, 191).
In remarkable condition for such a
fragile item, with small tear visible on verso and only very light
browning. Scarce: Printed for and distributed to members of the
Confederate Congress and military officers and officials, it can be
assumed that only a handful of copies have survived; we can locate only
one other copy having been offered for sale.
|